Blogging Employee Benefits

January 10, 2006

Phantom Account Offset Was Phantom Amendment

Filed under: Amendments, Litigation, Pensions — Fuguerre @ 4:21 am

Modifications made to the methodology that Xerox’s pension plan used to reduce rehired workers’ additional the benefit accruals of rehired workers by the value of lump sum distributions taken at earlier departure from the company were not properly communicated to employees. According to an appellate court ruling vacating the district court’s dismissal of the case, the changes to the plan did not constitute a permissible plan amendment; thus the plan’s “phantom account offset” could not be applied to reduce workers’ benefits. [Frommert et al. v. Conkright et al. No. 04-4609-cv, CA2 (1/6/06)]

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: